TY - JOUR
T1 - Validation of ActiReg® to measure physical activity and energy expenditure against doubly labelled water in obese persons
AU - Hustvedt, Bo Egil
AU - Svendsen, Mette
AU - Løvø, Arne
AU - Ellegård, Lars
AU - Hallén, Jostein
AU - Tonstad, Serena
N1 - Br J Nutr. 2008 Jul;100(1):219-26. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507886363. Epub 2008 Jan 15. Comparative Study; Validation Studies
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - ActiReg® is an instrument that uses combined recordings of body position and motion to calculate energy expenditure (EE) and physical activity (PA). The aim of the study was to compare mean total energy expenditure (TEE) measured by ActiReg® and doubly labelled water (DLW) in obese subjects. TEE was measured by the DLW method during a period of 14 d in fifty obese men and women with metabolic risk factors. During the same period ActiReg® recordings were obtained for 7 d. RMR was measured by indirect calorimetry and also estimated by standardized equations. Because EE may be disproportionately increased in obese subjects during weight-bearing activities, we established a new set of physical activity ratios (PAR). These ratios were based on oxygen uptake measurements during treadmill walking. The mean TEE according to the DLW was 13.94 (SD 2.47) MJ/d. Mean TEE calculated from the ActiReg® data and measured RMR was 13.39 (SD 2.26) MJ/d, an underestimation of 0.55 MJ (95 % CI 0.13, 0.98; P = 0.012) or 3.9 %. RMR derived from standard equations based on weight, age and sex were overestimated while the RMR based on fat-free mass values in addition was underestimated. Despite slight underestimation ActiReg® may be used to measure TEE in obese subjects on two premises: RMR should be measured, and the increased EE during weight-bearing activities in obese subjects should be considered.
AB - ActiReg® is an instrument that uses combined recordings of body position and motion to calculate energy expenditure (EE) and physical activity (PA). The aim of the study was to compare mean total energy expenditure (TEE) measured by ActiReg® and doubly labelled water (DLW) in obese subjects. TEE was measured by the DLW method during a period of 14 d in fifty obese men and women with metabolic risk factors. During the same period ActiReg® recordings were obtained for 7 d. RMR was measured by indirect calorimetry and also estimated by standardized equations. Because EE may be disproportionately increased in obese subjects during weight-bearing activities, we established a new set of physical activity ratios (PAR). These ratios were based on oxygen uptake measurements during treadmill walking. The mean TEE according to the DLW was 13.94 (SD 2.47) MJ/d. Mean TEE calculated from the ActiReg® data and measured RMR was 13.39 (SD 2.26) MJ/d, an underestimation of 0.55 MJ (95 % CI 0.13, 0.98; P = 0.012) or 3.9 %. RMR derived from standard equations based on weight, age and sex were overestimated while the RMR based on fat-free mass values in addition was underestimated. Despite slight underestimation ActiReg® may be used to measure TEE in obese subjects on two premises: RMR should be measured, and the increased EE during weight-bearing activities in obese subjects should be considered.
KW - Activity pattern
KW - Energy expenditure
KW - Physical activity
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=53049089481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=53049089481&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1017/S0007114507886363
DO - 10.1017/S0007114507886363
M3 - Article
C2 - 18197993
SN - 0007-1145
VL - 100
SP - 219
EP - 226
JO - British Journal of Nutrition
JF - British Journal of Nutrition
IS - 1
ER -