TY - JOUR
T1 - Success rate and strength of osseointegration of immediately loaded UV-photofunctionalized implants in a rat model
AU - Soltanzadeh, Pooya
AU - Ghassemi, Amirreza
AU - Ishijima, Manabu
AU - Tanaka, Miyuki
AU - Park, Wonhee
AU - Iwasaki, Chika
AU - Hirota, Makoto
AU - Ogawa, Takahiro
N1 - Copyright © 2016 Editorial Council for the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2017/9
Y1 - 2017/9
N2 - Statement of problem Despite its clinical benefits, the immediate loading protocol might have a higher risk of implant failure than the regular protocol. Ultraviolet (UV) photofunctionalization is a novel surface enhancement technique for dental implants. However, the effect of photofunctionalization under loading conditions is unclear. Purpose The purpose of this animal study was to evaluate the effect of photofunctionalization on the biomechanical quality and strength of osseointegration under loaded conditions in a rat model. Material and methods Untreated and photofunctionalized, acid-etched titanium implants were placed into rat femurs. The implants were immediately loaded with 0.46 N of constant lateral force. The implant positions were evaluated after 2 weeks of healing. The strength of osseointegration was evaluated by measuring the bone-implant interfacial breakdown point during biomechanical push-in testing. Results Photofunctionalization induced hydrophilic surfaces on the implants. Osseointegration was successful in 28.6% of untreated implants and 100% of photofunctionalized implants. The strength of osseointegration in successful implants was 2.4 times higher in photofunctionalized implants than in untreated implants. The degree of tilt of untreated implants toward the origin of force was twice that of photofunctionalized implants. Conclusions Within the limit of an animal model, photofunctionalization significantly increased the success of osseointegration and prevented implant tilt. Even for the implants that underwent successful osseointegration, the strength of osseointegration was significantly higher for photofunctionalized implants than for untreated implants. Further experiments are warranted to determine the effectiveness of photofunctionalization on immediately loaded dental implants.
AB - Statement of problem Despite its clinical benefits, the immediate loading protocol might have a higher risk of implant failure than the regular protocol. Ultraviolet (UV) photofunctionalization is a novel surface enhancement technique for dental implants. However, the effect of photofunctionalization under loading conditions is unclear. Purpose The purpose of this animal study was to evaluate the effect of photofunctionalization on the biomechanical quality and strength of osseointegration under loaded conditions in a rat model. Material and methods Untreated and photofunctionalized, acid-etched titanium implants were placed into rat femurs. The implants were immediately loaded with 0.46 N of constant lateral force. The implant positions were evaluated after 2 weeks of healing. The strength of osseointegration was evaluated by measuring the bone-implant interfacial breakdown point during biomechanical push-in testing. Results Photofunctionalization induced hydrophilic surfaces on the implants. Osseointegration was successful in 28.6% of untreated implants and 100% of photofunctionalized implants. The strength of osseointegration in successful implants was 2.4 times higher in photofunctionalized implants than in untreated implants. The degree of tilt of untreated implants toward the origin of force was twice that of photofunctionalized implants. Conclusions Within the limit of an animal model, photofunctionalization significantly increased the success of osseointegration and prevented implant tilt. Even for the implants that underwent successful osseointegration, the strength of osseointegration was significantly higher for photofunctionalized implants than for untreated implants. Further experiments are warranted to determine the effectiveness of photofunctionalization on immediately loaded dental implants.
KW - Biomechanical Phenomena
KW - Animals
KW - Surface Properties
KW - Male
KW - Models, Animal
KW - Weight-Bearing
KW - Dental Implants
KW - Ultraviolet Therapy/methods
KW - Osseointegration/physiology
KW - Rats, Sprague-Dawley
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85013031130
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85013031130#tab=citedBy
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/5a68e739-6c4d-3d21-a642-f0611296bd94/
U2 - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.008
DO - 10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.11.008
M3 - Article
C2 - 28222880
SN - 0022-3913
VL - 118
SP - 357
EP - 362
JO - The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
JF - The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
IS - 3
ER -