Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Standardization of Severe Sepsis Management: A Survey of Methodologies in Academic and Community Settings

  • H. Bryant Nguyen
  • , Jason Oh
  • , Ronny M. Otero
  • , Kristy Burroughs
  • , William A. Wittlake
  • , Stephen W. Corbett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Evidence-based therapies for severe sepsis include early antibiotics, early goal-directed therapy, corticosteroids, recombinant human activated protein C, glucose control, and lung protective strategies. Objective: The objective of this study was to analyze methods, challenges, and outcomes observed by hospitals that implemented a hospital-wide sepsis management protocol incorporating evidence-based therapies. Methods: In a cross-sectional multi-center telephone survey over a 4-month period, clinicians (participants) responsible for developing a hospital sepsis protocol were questioned regarding its development and outcomes. Results: Participants completing surveys represented 40 hospitals (20 academic and 20 community). Twenty-seven percent of protocol champions were Emergency physicians or nurses. Sixty-three percent reported protocol development time of 6-12 months. Eighty-eight percent of participants reported protocol initiation in the Emergency Department. Three participants reported hiring a nurse educator to implement the protocol. Ninety-five percent of participants measure lactate as part of patient screening. Protocol therapies reported included early antibiotics (98%), early goal directed-therapy (EGDT) (98%), corticosteroids (80%), and activated protein C (73%). Contributions to success included having a protocol champion (85%) and sepsis education program (65%). Twenty-one participants had recorded patient-level data, totaling 2319 protocol patients, compared to 1719 non-protocol patients, with in-hospital mortality of 23% and 44%, respectively. Conclusions: Implementation of a sepsis management protocol incorporating evidence-based therapies can be accomplished in both academic and community hospitals, with minimal additional staffing. The presence of a protocol champion and education program is crucial to success, and may result in improved patient outcome. © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)122-132
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Emergency Medicine
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2010

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Keywords

  • protocol implementation
  • septic shock
  • severe sepsis
  • survey
  • Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Sepsis/drug therapy
  • Humans
  • Clinical Protocols
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use
  • Community Health Services/organization & administration
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use

Cite this