TY - CHAP
T1 - Space carving and filtered back-projection as preconditioners for proton computed tomography reconstruction
AU - Schultze, Blake
AU - Witt, Micah
AU - Schubert, Keith E.
AU - Hurley, Robert F.
AU - Bashkirov, Vladimir
AU - Schulte, Reinhard W.
AU - Gomez, Ernesto
PY - 2013/7/8
Y1 - 2013/7/8
N2 - This paper considers how to determine the boundary of an object by comparing two methods: space carving (SC) and filtered back-projection (FBP). Determination of the boundary is an important first step in proton CT. The boundary is used to set up the large sparse linear system of equations, which are then solved to determine the relative stopping power of each element (voxel) in the object. For instance, to find the path of the proton through the object, the entry and exit points on the boundary must first be found. The boundary also becomes important in the iterative reconstruction, as only voxels inside the object are updated, to reduce computational complexity and prevent external artifacts from forming. SC and FBP are compared on speed and boundary results for four cases: (1) noiseless simulated data, (2) noisy simulated data, (3) a real pediatric head phantom, and (4) a real rat. The usefulness and potential of both methods are discussed and future directions are outlined. © 2012 IEEE.
AB - This paper considers how to determine the boundary of an object by comparing two methods: space carving (SC) and filtered back-projection (FBP). Determination of the boundary is an important first step in proton CT. The boundary is used to set up the large sparse linear system of equations, which are then solved to determine the relative stopping power of each element (voxel) in the object. For instance, to find the path of the proton through the object, the entry and exit points on the boundary must first be found. The boundary also becomes important in the iterative reconstruction, as only voxels inside the object are updated, to reduce computational complexity and prevent external artifacts from forming. SC and FBP are compared on speed and boundary results for four cases: (1) noiseless simulated data, (2) noisy simulated data, (3) a real pediatric head phantom, and (4) a real rat. The usefulness and potential of both methods are discussed and future directions are outlined. © 2012 IEEE.
KW - Filtered Back-Projection
KW - Preconditioning
KW - Proton Computed Tomography
KW - Space Carving
UR - https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Keith_Schubert/publication/261043993_Space_carving_and_filtered_back-projection_as_preconditioners_for_proton_computed_tomography_reconstruction/links/54c133ee0cf2d03405c4f8aa.pdf?disableCoverPage=true
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/acd5a524-fb4f-34e3-9e9d-257ffd5bc8dc/
U2 - 10.1109/NSSMIC.2012.6551987
DO - 10.1109/NSSMIC.2012.6551987
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9781467320306
T3 - Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference
SP - 4335
EP - 4340
BT - 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record (NSS/MIC)
T2 - 2012 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record, NSS/MIC 2012
Y2 - 29 October 2012 through 3 November 2012
ER -