TY - JOUR
T1 - Safe use of highly steatotic livers by utilizing a donor/recipient clinical algorithm
AU - Chavin, Kenneth D.
AU - Taber, David J.
AU - Norcross, Melissa
AU - Pilch, Nicole A.
AU - Crego, Heather
AU - Mcgillicuddy, John W.
AU - Bratton, Charles F.
AU - Lin, Angello
AU - Baliga, Prabhakar K.
N1 - Kenneth D. Chavin , Corresponding Author Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA Both Kenneth D. Chavin and David J. Taber are co-primary authors. Corresponding author: Kenneth D. Chavin, MD, PhD, Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, CSB Suite 409, Charleston, SC 29425, USA.
PY - 2013/9
Y1 - 2013/9
N2 - The aim of this study was to assess the long-term safety and clinical outcomes associated with the utilization of highly steatotic donor livers utilizing a specific donor/recipient matching algorithm. This was a prospective, observational, single-center, 10-yr follow-up study. Highly steatotic livers were utilized according to a donor/recipient algorithm that guided the surgeon to use highly steatotic donor organs judiciously in low-risk recipients. This study initially compared fat assessment based on frozen-section Ehrlich's hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to reperfusion biopsy fat assessment and demonstrated that H&E is an insensitive analysis to determine degree of steatosis. Patients were divided into three groups based on donor steatosis (group 1: <30% steatosis, group 2: 30-60% steatosis, group 3: >60% steatosis), and clinical outcomes were assessed. One hundred and sixteen patients were included in the analysis. Patients that received severely steatotic livers (>60% fat) showed increased reperfusion liver injury and delayed return of liver function in the early postoperative period, demonstrated by biochemical markers. However, there were no differences in primary non-function, postoperative complications, length of stay, and patient and graft survival. Using rigorous donor/recipient matching through a detailed algorithm, these data demonstrate that normal liver allograft outcomes are not superior to those in highly steatotic grafts.
AB - The aim of this study was to assess the long-term safety and clinical outcomes associated with the utilization of highly steatotic donor livers utilizing a specific donor/recipient matching algorithm. This was a prospective, observational, single-center, 10-yr follow-up study. Highly steatotic livers were utilized according to a donor/recipient algorithm that guided the surgeon to use highly steatotic donor organs judiciously in low-risk recipients. This study initially compared fat assessment based on frozen-section Ehrlich's hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) to reperfusion biopsy fat assessment and demonstrated that H&E is an insensitive analysis to determine degree of steatosis. Patients were divided into three groups based on donor steatosis (group 1: <30% steatosis, group 2: 30-60% steatosis, group 3: >60% steatosis), and clinical outcomes were assessed. One hundred and sixteen patients were included in the analysis. Patients that received severely steatotic livers (>60% fat) showed increased reperfusion liver injury and delayed return of liver function in the early postoperative period, demonstrated by biochemical markers. However, there were no differences in primary non-function, postoperative complications, length of stay, and patient and graft survival. Using rigorous donor/recipient matching through a detailed algorithm, these data demonstrate that normal liver allograft outcomes are not superior to those in highly steatotic grafts.
KW - Graft survival
KW - Liver transplantation
KW - Organ allocation
KW - Patient survival
KW - Steatosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884981585&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884981585&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/ctr.12211
DO - 10.1111/ctr.12211
M3 - Article
C2 - 23991646
SN - 0902-0063
VL - 27
SP - 732
EP - 741
JO - Clinical Transplantation
JF - Clinical Transplantation
IS - 5
ER -