TY - JOUR
T1 - Reliability and factorial validity of the Observer Alexithymia Scale - Chinese translation
AU - Yao, Shuqiao
AU - Yi, Jinyao
AU - Zhu, Xiongzhao
AU - Haviland, Mark G.
N1 - Psychiatry Res. 2005 Mar 30;134(1):93-100. Comparative Study
PY - 2005/3/30
Y1 - 2005/3/30
N2 - The purpose of the present study was to develop a Chinese translation of the Observer Alexithymia Scale (OAS-C) and evaluate its reliability and factorial validity. The original English-version of the Observer Alexithymia Scale (OAS) was translated into Chinese and given to 468 Chinese undergraduate students. Students were asked to rate a person (other than themselves) whom they knew well (e.g., a parent, sibling, another relative, or friend). We evaluated internal consistency, test-retest and inter-rater reliability, and factorial validity. Average OAS-C scores were slightly higher than, but comparable to, OAS scores in the normative samples (English-speaking/nonclinical). The OAS-C showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.84, and the mean inter-item correlation coefficient was 0.14), good stability (test-retest reliability with a 2-week interval was 0.90), and inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.78). Moreover, the OAS five-factor model (Distant, Uninsightful, Somatizing, Humorless, and Rigid) was confirmed: incremental fit index=0.905, comparative fit index=0.904, and root mean square error of approximation=0.086; each represented an adequate model fit. The OAS-C appears to be a reliable and valid observer-rated alexithymia measure. We recommend that researchers collect both self- and observer-rated alexithymia data and, when possible, obtain observer reports from more than one person. © 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
AB - The purpose of the present study was to develop a Chinese translation of the Observer Alexithymia Scale (OAS-C) and evaluate its reliability and factorial validity. The original English-version of the Observer Alexithymia Scale (OAS) was translated into Chinese and given to 468 Chinese undergraduate students. Students were asked to rate a person (other than themselves) whom they knew well (e.g., a parent, sibling, another relative, or friend). We evaluated internal consistency, test-retest and inter-rater reliability, and factorial validity. Average OAS-C scores were slightly higher than, but comparable to, OAS scores in the normative samples (English-speaking/nonclinical). The OAS-C showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.84, and the mean inter-item correlation coefficient was 0.14), good stability (test-retest reliability with a 2-week interval was 0.90), and inter-rater reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient was 0.78). Moreover, the OAS five-factor model (Distant, Uninsightful, Somatizing, Humorless, and Rigid) was confirmed: incremental fit index=0.905, comparative fit index=0.904, and root mean square error of approximation=0.086; each represented an adequate model fit. The OAS-C appears to be a reliable and valid observer-rated alexithymia measure. We recommend that researchers collect both self- and observer-rated alexithymia data and, when possible, obtain observer reports from more than one person. © 2005 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
KW - Alexithymia
KW - Observer ratings
KW - Reliability
KW - Validity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/16244392108
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/16244392108#tab=citedBy
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/85be203d-cff6-3831-b2d9-7ca63f79c847/
U2 - 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.08.010
DO - 10.1016/j.psychres.2004.08.010
M3 - Article
C2 - 15808294
SN - 0165-1781
VL - 134
SP - 93
EP - 100
JO - Psychiatry Research
JF - Psychiatry Research
IS - 1
ER -