TY - JOUR
T1 - Recommendations for a screening series for allergic contact eyelid dermatitis
AU - Herro, Elise M.
AU - Elsaie, Mohammed L.
AU - Nijhawan, Rajiv I.
AU - Jacob, Sharon E.
N1 - Dermatitis. 2012 Jan-Feb;23(1):17-21. doi: 10.1097/DER.0b013e31823d191f. Practice Guideline
PY - 2012/2
Y1 - 2012/2
N2 - Background: Although allergic contact dermatitis of the eyelids is a common condition, limited information is available regarding the selection of patch-testing chemicals for proper evaluation. Objective: The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the relevance of allergens responsible for allergic eyelid dermatitis among a series of patch-tested patients attending our clinic at the University of Miami and compare these results to published studies in the literature. Methods: Data were retrospectively reviewed for eyelid-only dermatitis from clinically relevant patch-test evaluations performed between December 2004 and January 2007. Results: Formaldehyde was the most frequently encountered antigen, accounting for 45.83% (11/24) of the cases, followed by nickel 33.33% (8/24) and balsam of Peru (Myroxylon pereirae) 29.17% (7/24). In addition, not only did wefind a higher prevalence of certain allergens when compared with other studies, but we identified several relevant allergens not previously reported at other referral centers. Conclusions: The allergens found to be relevant in eyelid dermatitis vary among different regions. These data may help contribute to generating a standard screening tool to improve the detection and management of these cases. © 2012 American Contact Dermatitis Society. All Rights Reserved.
AB - Background: Although allergic contact dermatitis of the eyelids is a common condition, limited information is available regarding the selection of patch-testing chemicals for proper evaluation. Objective: The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the relevance of allergens responsible for allergic eyelid dermatitis among a series of patch-tested patients attending our clinic at the University of Miami and compare these results to published studies in the literature. Methods: Data were retrospectively reviewed for eyelid-only dermatitis from clinically relevant patch-test evaluations performed between December 2004 and January 2007. Results: Formaldehyde was the most frequently encountered antigen, accounting for 45.83% (11/24) of the cases, followed by nickel 33.33% (8/24) and balsam of Peru (Myroxylon pereirae) 29.17% (7/24). In addition, not only did wefind a higher prevalence of certain allergens when compared with other studies, but we identified several relevant allergens not previously reported at other referral centers. Conclusions: The allergens found to be relevant in eyelid dermatitis vary among different regions. These data may help contribute to generating a standard screening tool to improve the detection and management of these cases. © 2012 American Contact Dermatitis Society. All Rights Reserved.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84865024148
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84865024148#tab=citedBy
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/169cb2d6-2c71-32e4-a15d-e71e1b8db62b/
U2 - 10.1097/DER.0b013e31823d191f
DO - 10.1097/DER.0b013e31823d191f
M3 - Article
C2 - 22653064
SN - 1710-3568
VL - 23
SP - 17
EP - 21
JO - Dermatitis
JF - Dermatitis
IS - 1
ER -