Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Randomized trial comparing conventional-dose with high-dose conformal radiation therapy in early-stage adenocarcinoma of the prostate: Long-term results from Proton Radiation Oncology Group/American College Of Radiology 95-09

  • Anthony L. Zietman
  • , Kyounghwa Bae
  • , Jerry D. Slater
  • , William U. Shipley
  • , Jason A. Efstathiou
  • , John J. Coen
  • , David A. Bush
  • , Margie Lunt
  • , Daphna Y. Spiegel
  • , Rafi Skowronski
  • , B. Rodney Jabola
  • , Carl J. Rossi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: To test the hypothesis that increasing radiation dose delivered to men with early-stage prostate cancer improves clinical outcomes. Patients and Methods: Men with T1b-T2b prostate cancer and prostate-specific antigen ≤ 15 ng/mL were randomly assigned to a total dose of either 70.2 Gray equivalents (GyE; conventional) or 79.2 GyE (high). No patient received androgen suppression therapy with radiation. Local failure (LF), biochemical failure (BF), and overall survival (OS) were outcomes. Results: A total of 393 men were randomly assigned, and median follow-up was 8.9 years. Men receiving high-dose radiation therapy were significantly less likely to have LF, with a hazard ratio of 0.57. The 10-year American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology BF rates were 32.4% for conventional-dose and 16.7% for high-dose radiation therapy (P < .0001). This difference held when only those with low-risk disease (n = 227; 58% of total) were examined: 28.2% for conventional and 7.1% for high dose (P < .0001). There was a strong trend in the same direction for the intermediate-risk patients (n = 144; 37% of total; 42.1% v 30.4%, P = .06). Eleven percent of patients subsequently required androgen deprivation for recurrence after conventional dose compared with 6% after high dose (P = .047). There remains no difference in OS rates between the treatment arms (78.4% v 83.4%; P = .41). Two percent of patients in both arms experienced late grade ≥ 3 genitourinary toxicity, and 1% of patients in the high-dose arm experienced late grade ≥ 3 GI toxicity. Conclusion: This randomized controlled trial shows superior long-term cancer control for men with localized prostate cancer receiving high-dose versus conventional-dose radiation. This was achieved without an increase in grade ≥ 3 late urinary or rectal morbidity. © 2010 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1106-1111
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume28
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2010

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Keywords

  • Radiotherapy Dosage
  • Radiotherapy, Conformal/adverse effects
  • Adenocarcinoma/mortality
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Male
  • Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Prostatic Neoplasms/mortality

Cite this