TY - JOUR
T1 - Percutaneous Externally Assembled Laparoscopic Instruments
T2 - Creation of a New Surgical Paradigm
AU - Arenas, Javier L.
AU - Alsyouf, Muhannad
AU - Jang, Michael
AU - Myklak, Kristene
AU - Faaborg, Daniel
AU - Khater, Nazih
AU - Baldwin, D. Duane
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Objectives: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) produce excellent cosmetic outcomes, but are technically challenging. The objective of this study was to test the functionality and feasibility of a novel minimally invasive surgical paradigm, which maintains triangulation but uses special externally assembled instruments to minimize the postoperative cosmetic impact. Methods: Percutaneous Externally Assembled Laparoscopic (PEAL) instruments have specialized 2.96-mm shafts with interchangeable 5-mm working tips that are assembled externally. First, 5-mm laparoscopic, PEAL, and 2-mm needlescopic instruments were tested to determine piercing force on fresh human cadaver organs. In a bench-top study, 20 subjects assembled and used PEAL instruments in five different skills tests that were also compared with the same tasks using conventional laparoscopic instruments. Finally, PEAL instrument functionality was tested in a four-porcine nephrectomy feasibility study. Results: PEAL (2.80 lbF) and 5-mm laparoscopic instruments (2.28 lbF) had a significantly higher mean organ piercing perforation force compared with needlescopic instruments (1.39 lbF, p < 0.05). Average assembly time of PEAL instruments was 31.08 seconds (range: 19.83-43.85). There were no significant differences in the amount of time needed for completion of the bench-top tasks between laparoscopic and PEAL instruments (p > 0.05 for all tasks). Four-porcine PEAL nephrectomies were completed with no complications and minimal blood loss (mean 7.5 mL). Mean operative time was 98.25 minutes (range 79-116). Conclusion: PEAL tools are easily assembled, have similar safety and efficacy compared with standard laparoscopic tools, and are less likely to injure organs compared with needlescopic instruments. They function well during laparoscopic nephrectomy and may decrease the invasiveness of conventional laparoscopic instrumentation.
AB - Objectives: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) produce excellent cosmetic outcomes, but are technically challenging. The objective of this study was to test the functionality and feasibility of a novel minimally invasive surgical paradigm, which maintains triangulation but uses special externally assembled instruments to minimize the postoperative cosmetic impact. Methods: Percutaneous Externally Assembled Laparoscopic (PEAL) instruments have specialized 2.96-mm shafts with interchangeable 5-mm working tips that are assembled externally. First, 5-mm laparoscopic, PEAL, and 2-mm needlescopic instruments were tested to determine piercing force on fresh human cadaver organs. In a bench-top study, 20 subjects assembled and used PEAL instruments in five different skills tests that were also compared with the same tasks using conventional laparoscopic instruments. Finally, PEAL instrument functionality was tested in a four-porcine nephrectomy feasibility study. Results: PEAL (2.80 lbF) and 5-mm laparoscopic instruments (2.28 lbF) had a significantly higher mean organ piercing perforation force compared with needlescopic instruments (1.39 lbF, p < 0.05). Average assembly time of PEAL instruments was 31.08 seconds (range: 19.83-43.85). There were no significant differences in the amount of time needed for completion of the bench-top tasks between laparoscopic and PEAL instruments (p > 0.05 for all tasks). Four-porcine PEAL nephrectomies were completed with no complications and minimal blood loss (mean 7.5 mL). Mean operative time was 98.25 minutes (range 79-116). Conclusion: PEAL tools are easily assembled, have similar safety and efficacy compared with standard laparoscopic tools, and are less likely to injure organs compared with needlescopic instruments. They function well during laparoscopic nephrectomy and may decrease the invasiveness of conventional laparoscopic instrumentation.
KW - Operative Time
KW - Animals
KW - Swine
KW - Humans
KW - Female
KW - Models, Animal
KW - Nephrectomy/instrumentation
KW - Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/instrumentation
KW - Pressure
KW - Cadaver
KW - Kidney
KW - Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84964958288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84964958288&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/9a0453bf-3f31-37f1-bcef-51e973eea3fe/
U2 - 10.1089/end.2015.0240
DO - 10.1089/end.2015.0240
M3 - Article
C2 - 26732739
SN - 0892-7790
VL - 30
SP - 433
EP - 440
JO - Journal of Endourology
JF - Journal of Endourology
IS - 4
ER -