TY - JOUR
T1 - Paleomagnetism of the Cambro‐Ordovician Arbuckle Group and associated deposits in the southern Oklahoma Aulacogen
T2 - Evidence for block rotations
AU - Elmore, R. Douglas
AU - Nick, Kevin E.
AU - Cochran, Karen A.
AU - Crawford, Lisa D.
N1 - Enter your email address below. If your address has been previously registered, you will receive an email with instructions on how to reset your password. If you don't receive an email, you should register as a new user
PY - 1988/4
Y1 - 1988/4
N2 - The magnetization in hydrocarbon‐impregnated Arbuckle Group limestones from the southern margin of the Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen (Limestone Hills) is secondary and resides in magnetite. The magnetization (Declination/Inclination=128°/2°, α95=7.6°, k=79) fails a fold test and is post Pennsylvanian. The corresponding pole position (146°E, 30°N), however, does not coincide with the post‐Pennsylvanian Apparent Polar Wander Path (APWP). Some Permian speleothems that fill caves in these rocks contain magnetizations that are also anomalous. Shallow remanent inclinations from the folded limestones and speleothems suggest that the most likely time of remanence acquisition was the Permian. The directions are at least 30° in declination from the expected directions based on the inferred ages of the magnetizations. This discrepancy can be explained by a horizontal counterclockwise rotation, consistent with left‐lateral wrench faulting, during deformation of the aulacogen.
AB - The magnetization in hydrocarbon‐impregnated Arbuckle Group limestones from the southern margin of the Southern Oklahoma Aulacogen (Limestone Hills) is secondary and resides in magnetite. The magnetization (Declination/Inclination=128°/2°, α95=7.6°, k=79) fails a fold test and is post Pennsylvanian. The corresponding pole position (146°E, 30°N), however, does not coincide with the post‐Pennsylvanian Apparent Polar Wander Path (APWP). Some Permian speleothems that fill caves in these rocks contain magnetizations that are also anomalous. Shallow remanent inclinations from the folded limestones and speleothems suggest that the most likely time of remanence acquisition was the Permian. The directions are at least 30° in declination from the expected directions based on the inferred ages of the magnetizations. This discrepancy can be explained by a horizontal counterclockwise rotation, consistent with left‐lateral wrench faulting, during deformation of the aulacogen.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0023685289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0023685289&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1029/GL015i004p00380
DO - 10.1029/GL015i004p00380
M3 - Article
SN - 0094-8276
VL - 15
SP - 380
EP - 383
JO - Geophysical Research Letters
JF - Geophysical Research Letters
IS - 4
ER -