Most lay people can correctly identify indigenous venomous snakes

Stephen W. Corbett, Brian Anderson, Brett Nelson, Sean Bush, William K. Hayes, Mike D. Cardwell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

We attempted to determine how accurately members of the public can identify venomous snakes. Six different snakes indigenous to southern California were displayed in cages for 265 people to view at a street fair. These included 4 nonvenomous snakes and 2 venomous snakes. People were asked whether the snake was venomous and the name of the snake, if they knew it. Overall, people recognized whether a snake was venomous or nonvenomous 81% of the time. They were most accurate at identifying rattlesnakes as being venomous (95%) but incorrectly identified nonvenomous snakes as being venomous 25% of the time. Men were more accurate than women, and adults were more accurate than children. Subjects were less well able to identify the exact species of snakes. The results suggest that there may be no need to capture, kill, or bring a snake to the hospital for identification, at least in this geographic area.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)759-762
Number of pages4
JournalAmerican Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume23
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2005

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Emergency Medicine

Cite this