More medications, more problems: results from the Sedation Level after Emergent Exlap with Packing for TRAUMA (SLEEP-TRAUMA) study

Tracey Kim, Christopher Celis, Andrew Pop, Kaitlin McArthur, Thomas Robert Bushell, Xian Luo-Owen, Lourdes Swentek, Sigrid Burruss, Steven Brooks, David Turay, Kaushik Mukherjee

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose: Sedation management of trauma patients after damage control laparotomy (DCL) has not been optimized. We evaluated if shorter sedation exposure was associated with increased proportion of delirium-free/coma-free (DF/CF-ICU) days and change in time to definitive fascial closure (DFC). Methods: We reviewed trauma DCL patients at an ACS-verified level I center over 5 years as shorter (SE) or longer than median (LE) sedation exposure. We compared demographics, injury patterns, hemodynamic parameters, and injury severity between groups. We calculated the propensity for each patient to achieve DFC using age, gender, ISS, red blood cell transfusion, bowel discontinuity, abdominal vascular injury, and time to first takeback; we then determined the effect of sedation exposure on rate of DFC by multivariate Cox regression, adjusted for propensity to achieve DFC. We used linear regression adjusted for age, ISS, head-AIS, bowel discontinuity, and vascular injury to determine the effect of sedation exposure on the proportion of DF/CF-ICU days. Results: 65 patients (33.8% penetrating) had mean age 41.8 ± 16.0, ISS 27.1 ± 14.2, Head-AIS 1.2 ± 1.6 and median sedation exposure of 2.2 [IQR 0.78, 7.3] days (35 SE and 30 LE). Pattern and severity of solid organ injuries and proportion of small and large bowel and vascular injuries were similar between groups. LE had more abdominal sepsis (23.3% vs 0%, p = 0.003) and enterocutaneous fistula (16.7% vs 0%, p = 0.016), and more ventilator (17.3 ± 12.7 vs 6.1 ± 6.8, p < 0.001), ICU (20.8 ± 14.2 vs 7.2 ± 7.6, p < 0.001), and hospital days (29.6 ± 19.6 vs 13.9 ± 9.0, p < 0.001). DFC was achieved more rapidly in the SE group (2.0 ± 1.5 days vs 3.9 ± 3.7 days [unadjusted], p = 0.023) and SE had a higher proportion of unadjusted DF/CF-ICU days (33.0 ± 32.0% vs 18.1 ± 16.4%, p = 0.020). SE was associated with an increased proportion of adjusted DF/CF-ICU days by multivariate linear regression (13.1% [95% CI 1.4–24.8%], p = 0.029) and with faster adjusted rate of DFC by multivariate Cox regression (RR 2.28 [95% CI 1.25–4.15, p = 0.007]). Conclusions: Shorter sedation exposure is associated with increased proportion of DF/CF-ICU days and more rapid DFC after DCL for trauma.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)943-952
    Number of pages10
    JournalEuropean Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery
    Volume48
    Issue number2
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Apr 2022

    ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

    • Surgery
    • Emergency Medicine
    • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
    • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

    Keywords

    • Damage control laparotomy
    • Definitive fascial closure
    • Delirium
    • Sedation
    • Trauma
    • Abdominal Injuries/surgery
    • Humans
    • Middle Aged
    • Laparotomy/methods
    • Injury Severity Score
    • Sleep
    • Adult
    • Retrospective Studies
    • Vascular System Injuries

    Cite this