TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of Addition of Different Nanoparticles on the Surface Properties of Poly(methylmethacrylate) Denture Base Material
AU - Gad, Mohammed M.
AU - Abualsaud, Reem
AU - Al-Thobity, Ahmad M.
AU - Baba, Nadim Z.
AU - Al-Harbi, Fahad A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the American College of Prosthodontists
PY - 2020/6/1
Y1 - 2020/6/1
N2 - Purpose: To evaluate and compare the surface properties (roughness and hardness) of poly(methylmethacrylate) denture base material modified with zirconium dioxide (ZNPs), silicon dioxide (SNPs), and diamond (DNPs) nanoparticles. Materials and methods: Two hundred sixty heat-polymerized acrylic resin disks (15 × 2 mm) were prepared. ZNPs, SNPs, and DNPs were added in concentrations of 0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.5%, and 5.0% by weight of acrylic powder. This yielded a total of 13 groups for each test according to filler type and concentration (n = 10/group). The control group was made of pure acrylic. A mechanical polisher was used to standardize specimens’ surfaces before testing. A profilometer and Vickers hardness indenter were used to test the surface roughness and hardness, respectively. ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests were used for data analysis (α = 0.05). Results: In comparison to control, results showed a nonsignificant increase in surface roughness (Ra) of acrylic material after the addition of 0.5% nanoparticles (ZNPs p = 0.168, SNPs p = 0.166, and DNPs p = 0.177), while a significant increase was seen with all other concentrations (p ˂ 0.05). Ra values of ZNP and DNP groups were significantly higher than those of the SNPs group (p < 0.001). The addition of any of the fillers to acrylic denture base materials significantly increased the hardness (p ˂ 0.05), with ZNPs and DNPs having values lower than those of the SNPs group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although nanofiller addition increased the hardness of denture base material, Ra was adversely affected when the concentration exceeded 0.5%. Therefore, 0.5% is suggested to be the most appropriate ratio to improve hardness with acceptable Ra.
AB - Purpose: To evaluate and compare the surface properties (roughness and hardness) of poly(methylmethacrylate) denture base material modified with zirconium dioxide (ZNPs), silicon dioxide (SNPs), and diamond (DNPs) nanoparticles. Materials and methods: Two hundred sixty heat-polymerized acrylic resin disks (15 × 2 mm) were prepared. ZNPs, SNPs, and DNPs were added in concentrations of 0%, 0.5%, 1.0%, 2.5%, and 5.0% by weight of acrylic powder. This yielded a total of 13 groups for each test according to filler type and concentration (n = 10/group). The control group was made of pure acrylic. A mechanical polisher was used to standardize specimens’ surfaces before testing. A profilometer and Vickers hardness indenter were used to test the surface roughness and hardness, respectively. ANOVA and Tukey post hoc tests were used for data analysis (α = 0.05). Results: In comparison to control, results showed a nonsignificant increase in surface roughness (Ra) of acrylic material after the addition of 0.5% nanoparticles (ZNPs p = 0.168, SNPs p = 0.166, and DNPs p = 0.177), while a significant increase was seen with all other concentrations (p ˂ 0.05). Ra values of ZNP and DNP groups were significantly higher than those of the SNPs group (p < 0.001). The addition of any of the fillers to acrylic denture base materials significantly increased the hardness (p ˂ 0.05), with ZNPs and DNPs having values lower than those of the SNPs group (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Although nanofiller addition increased the hardness of denture base material, Ra was adversely affected when the concentration exceeded 0.5%. Therefore, 0.5% is suggested to be the most appropriate ratio to improve hardness with acceptable Ra.
KW - Hardness
KW - nanoparticle
KW - poly(methylmethacrylate)
KW - removable prosthesis
KW - removable prosthodontics
KW - surface roughness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85083500647&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85083500647&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/jopr.13168
DO - 10.1111/jopr.13168
M3 - Article
C2 - 32233047
SN - 1059-941X
VL - 29
SP - 422
EP - 428
JO - Journal of Prosthodontics
JF - Journal of Prosthodontics
IS - 5
ER -