TY - JOUR
T1 - Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality
AU - Nguyen, H. Bryant
AU - Corbett, Stephen W.
AU - Steele, Robert
AU - Banta, Jim
AU - Clark, Robin T.
AU - Hayes, Sean R.
AU - Edwards, Jeremy
AU - Cho, Thomas W.
AU - Wittlake, William A.
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors received no external funding to perform this study. Dr. Nguyen has received lecture honoraria from Edwards Lifesciences and Eli Lilly and research funding from Edwards Lifesciences. The remaining authors have not disclosed any potential conflicts of interest.
PY - 2007/4
Y1 - 2007/4
N2 - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome implications of implementing a severe sepsis bundle in an emergency department as a quality indicator set with feedback to modify physician behavior related to the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock. DESIGN: Two-year prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Academic tertiary care facility. PATIENTS: Patients were 330 patients presenting to the emergency department who met criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: Five quality indicators comprised the bundle for severe sepsis management in the emergency department: a) initiate central venous pressure (CVP)/central venous oxygen saturation (Scvo2) monitoring within 2 hrs; b) give broad-spectrum antibiotics within 4 hrs; c) complete early goal-directed therapy at 6 hrs; d) give corticosteroid if the patient is on vasopressor or if adrenal insufficiency is suspected; and e) monitor for lactate clearance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 63.8 ± 18.5 yrs, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 29.6 ± 10.6, emergency department length of stay 8.5 ± 4.4 hrs, hospital length of stay 11.3 ± 12.9 days, and in-hospital mortality 35.2%. Bundle compliance increased from zero to 51.2% at the end of the study period. During the emergency department stay, patients with the bundle completed received more CVP/Scvo2 monitoring (100.0 vs. 64.8%, p < .01), more antibiotics (100.0 vs. 89.7%, p = .04), and more corticosteroid (29.9 vs. 16.2%, p = .01) compared with patients with the bundle not completed. In a multivariate regression analysis including the five quality indicators, completion of early goal-directed therapy was significantly associated with decreased mortality (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.79; p = .01). In-hospital mortality was less in patients with the bundle completed compared with patients with the bundle not completed (20.8 vs. 39.5%, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a severe sepsis bundle using a quality improvement feedback to modify physician behavior in the emergency department setting was feasible and was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality. © 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
AB - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome implications of implementing a severe sepsis bundle in an emergency department as a quality indicator set with feedback to modify physician behavior related to the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock. DESIGN: Two-year prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Academic tertiary care facility. PATIENTS: Patients were 330 patients presenting to the emergency department who met criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: Five quality indicators comprised the bundle for severe sepsis management in the emergency department: a) initiate central venous pressure (CVP)/central venous oxygen saturation (Scvo2) monitoring within 2 hrs; b) give broad-spectrum antibiotics within 4 hrs; c) complete early goal-directed therapy at 6 hrs; d) give corticosteroid if the patient is on vasopressor or if adrenal insufficiency is suspected; and e) monitor for lactate clearance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 63.8 ± 18.5 yrs, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 29.6 ± 10.6, emergency department length of stay 8.5 ± 4.4 hrs, hospital length of stay 11.3 ± 12.9 days, and in-hospital mortality 35.2%. Bundle compliance increased from zero to 51.2% at the end of the study period. During the emergency department stay, patients with the bundle completed received more CVP/Scvo2 monitoring (100.0 vs. 64.8%, p < .01), more antibiotics (100.0 vs. 89.7%, p = .04), and more corticosteroid (29.9 vs. 16.2%, p = .01) compared with patients with the bundle not completed. In a multivariate regression analysis including the five quality indicators, completion of early goal-directed therapy was significantly associated with decreased mortality (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.79; p = .01). In-hospital mortality was less in patients with the bundle completed compared with patients with the bundle not completed (20.8 vs. 39.5%, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a severe sepsis bundle using a quality improvement feedback to modify physician behavior in the emergency department setting was feasible and was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality. © 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
KW - Early goal-directed therapy
KW - Emergency department
KW - Sepsis bundle
KW - Sepsis quality indicators
KW - Length of Stay
KW - Severity of Illness Index
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Hospital Mortality
KW - Hospitals, University/organization & administration
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Clinical Protocols
KW - Male
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration
KW - Quality Indicators, Health Care/organization & administration
KW - Guideline Adherence
KW - Sepsis/mortality
KW - Female
KW - Aged
KW - Shock, Septic/mortality
KW - APACHE
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/34247175892
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/34247175892#tab=citedBy
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/119b077d-9438-3f29-b13a-cd4b602b50a9/
U2 - 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259463.33848.3D
DO - 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259463.33848.3D
M3 - Article
C2 - 17334251
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 35
SP - 1105
EP - 1112
JO - Critical Care Medicine
JF - Critical Care Medicine
IS - 4
ER -