Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality

  • H. Bryant Nguyen
  • , Stephen W. Corbett
  • , Robert Steele
  • , Jim Banta
  • , Robin T. Clark
  • , Sean R. Hayes
  • , Jeremy Edwards
  • , Thomas W. Cho
  • , William A. Wittlake

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the outcome implications of implementing a severe sepsis bundle in an emergency department as a quality indicator set with feedback to modify physician behavior related to the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock. DESIGN: Two-year prospective observational cohort. SETTING: Academic tertiary care facility. PATIENTS: Patients were 330 patients presenting to the emergency department who met criteria for severe sepsis or septic shock. INTERVENTIONS: Five quality indicators comprised the bundle for severe sepsis management in the emergency department: a) initiate central venous pressure (CVP)/central venous oxygen saturation (Scvo2) monitoring within 2 hrs; b) give broad-spectrum antibiotics within 4 hrs; c) complete early goal-directed therapy at 6 hrs; d) give corticosteroid if the patient is on vasopressor or if adrenal insufficiency is suspected; and e) monitor for lactate clearance. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients had a mean age of 63.8 ± 18.5 yrs, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score 29.6 ± 10.6, emergency department length of stay 8.5 ± 4.4 hrs, hospital length of stay 11.3 ± 12.9 days, and in-hospital mortality 35.2%. Bundle compliance increased from zero to 51.2% at the end of the study period. During the emergency department stay, patients with the bundle completed received more CVP/Scvo2 monitoring (100.0 vs. 64.8%, p < .01), more antibiotics (100.0 vs. 89.7%, p = .04), and more corticosteroid (29.9 vs. 16.2%, p = .01) compared with patients with the bundle not completed. In a multivariate regression analysis including the five quality indicators, completion of early goal-directed therapy was significantly associated with decreased mortality (odds ratio, 0.36; 95% confidence interval, 0.17-0.79; p = .01). In-hospital mortality was less in patients with the bundle completed compared with patients with the bundle not completed (20.8 vs. 39.5%, p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a severe sepsis bundle using a quality improvement feedback to modify physician behavior in the emergency department setting was feasible and was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality. © 2007 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1105-1112
Number of pages8
JournalCritical Care Medicine
Volume35
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2007

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Keywords

  • Early goal-directed therapy
  • Emergency department
  • Sepsis bundle
  • Sepsis quality indicators
  • Length of Stay
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Prospective Studies
  • Hospital Mortality
  • Hospitals, University/organization & administration
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Clinical Protocols
  • Male
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration
  • Quality Indicators, Health Care/organization & administration
  • Guideline Adherence
  • Sepsis/mortality
  • Female
  • Aged
  • Shock, Septic/mortality
  • APACHE

Cite this