TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation of normal prostate tissue, chronic prostatitis, and prostate cancer by quantitative perfusion analysis using a dynamic contrast-enhanced inversion-prepared dual-contrast gradient echo sequence
AU - Franiel, Tobias
AU - Lüdemann, Lutz
AU - Rudolph, Birgit
AU - Rehbein, Hagen
AU - Staack, Andrea
AU - Taupitz, Matthias
AU - Prochnow, Daniel
AU - Beyersdorff, Dirk
N1 - Invest Radiol. 2008 Jul;43(7):481-7. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31816b2f63. Evaluation Studies; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PY - 2008/7
Y1 - 2008/7
N2 - Objective:: To quantify independent pharmacokinetic parameters for differentiation of prostate pathology. Material and methods:: Twenty-seven patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer (PSA: 1.4-16.1 ng/mL) underwent magnetic resonance imaging with a new dynamic contrast-enhanced, inversion-prepared dual-contrast gradient echo sequence (T1/T2*-weighted, 1.65 seconds temporal resolution) using a combined endorectal/body phased-array coil at 1.5 Tesla. Perfusion, blood volume, mean transit time, delay, and dispersion were calculated using a sequential 3-compartment model. Twenty-three patients underwent prostatectomy. For histologic correlation a pathologist mapped areas of normal prostate tissue, chronic prostatitis, and prostate cancer (total of 63 areas) on histologic sections corresponding to the magnetic resonance imaging planes. Results:: Compared with normal prostate tissue, low-grade cancer (Gleason score ≤6) only showed higher perfusion (1.01 mL/cm/min vs. 0.26 mL/cm/min, P = 0.050), whereas high-grade cancer showed higher perfusion (1.21 mL/cm/min vs. 0.26 mL/cm/min, P ≤ 0.001), higher blood volume (1.44% vs. 0.95%, P = 0.005), shorter mean transit time (3.55 seconds vs. 4.40 seconds, P = 0.019), shorter delay (10.15 seconds vs. 13.36 seconds, P = 0.015), and smaller dispersion (8.56 seconds vs. 12.11 seconds, P = 0.020). High-grade cancer showed higher perfusion than chronic prostatitis (1.21 mL/cm/min vs. 0.90 mL/cm/min, P = 0.041). Chronic prostatitis showed higher perfusion (0.90 mL/cm/min vs. 0.26 mL/cm/min, P = 0.006), higher blood volume (1.53% vs. 0.95%, P = 0.046), shorter delay (11.42 seconds vs. 13.36 seconds, P = 0.015), and smaller dispersion (10.49 seconds vs. 12.11 seconds, P = 0.020) than normal prostate tissue. There were no statistically significant differences between low-grade and high-grade cancer or between low-grade cancer and chronic prostatitis. Conclusion:: The pharmacokinetic parameters investigated, especially perfusion, allow statistically significant in situ differentiation of normal prostate tissue from cancer and chronic prostatitis and of high-grade cancer from chronic prostatitis. Copyright © 2008 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
AB - Objective:: To quantify independent pharmacokinetic parameters for differentiation of prostate pathology. Material and methods:: Twenty-seven patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer (PSA: 1.4-16.1 ng/mL) underwent magnetic resonance imaging with a new dynamic contrast-enhanced, inversion-prepared dual-contrast gradient echo sequence (T1/T2*-weighted, 1.65 seconds temporal resolution) using a combined endorectal/body phased-array coil at 1.5 Tesla. Perfusion, blood volume, mean transit time, delay, and dispersion were calculated using a sequential 3-compartment model. Twenty-three patients underwent prostatectomy. For histologic correlation a pathologist mapped areas of normal prostate tissue, chronic prostatitis, and prostate cancer (total of 63 areas) on histologic sections corresponding to the magnetic resonance imaging planes. Results:: Compared with normal prostate tissue, low-grade cancer (Gleason score ≤6) only showed higher perfusion (1.01 mL/cm/min vs. 0.26 mL/cm/min, P = 0.050), whereas high-grade cancer showed higher perfusion (1.21 mL/cm/min vs. 0.26 mL/cm/min, P ≤ 0.001), higher blood volume (1.44% vs. 0.95%, P = 0.005), shorter mean transit time (3.55 seconds vs. 4.40 seconds, P = 0.019), shorter delay (10.15 seconds vs. 13.36 seconds, P = 0.015), and smaller dispersion (8.56 seconds vs. 12.11 seconds, P = 0.020). High-grade cancer showed higher perfusion than chronic prostatitis (1.21 mL/cm/min vs. 0.90 mL/cm/min, P = 0.041). Chronic prostatitis showed higher perfusion (0.90 mL/cm/min vs. 0.26 mL/cm/min, P = 0.006), higher blood volume (1.53% vs. 0.95%, P = 0.046), shorter delay (11.42 seconds vs. 13.36 seconds, P = 0.015), and smaller dispersion (10.49 seconds vs. 12.11 seconds, P = 0.020) than normal prostate tissue. There were no statistically significant differences between low-grade and high-grade cancer or between low-grade cancer and chronic prostatitis. Conclusion:: The pharmacokinetic parameters investigated, especially perfusion, allow statistically significant in situ differentiation of normal prostate tissue from cancer and chronic prostatitis and of high-grade cancer from chronic prostatitis. Copyright © 2008 by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
KW - Dynamic susceptibility contrastdynamic contrast-enhanced- magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Perfusion
KW - Prostate cancer
KW - Prostatitis
KW - Diagnosis, Differential
KW - Reproducibility of Results
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods
KW - Male
KW - Prostatitis/diagnosis
KW - Contrast Media
KW - Prostate/pathology
KW - Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis
KW - Sensitivity and Specificity
KW - Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
KW - Aged
KW - Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods
KW - Image Enhancement/methods
KW - Gadolinium DTPA
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=50949130679&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=50949130679&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/03ab194e-b1b8-3e1a-bc63-f4c658875409/
U2 - 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31816b2f63
DO - 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31816b2f63
M3 - Article
C2 - 18580330
SN - 0020-9996
VL - 43
SP - 481
EP - 487
JO - Investigative Radiology
JF - Investigative Radiology
IS - 7
ER -