Abstract
Background: African Americans (AA) have higher rejection rates and poorer graft outcomes compared to non-AAs. Induction therapy is yet unproven in this high risk population. Methods: This retrospective study compared the efficacy of induction therapy [IL-2 receptor antibodies (IL2RA) or thymoglobulin] vs. no induction. Results: One hundred and seventy-five AA patients were included in this analysis. Patients were well matched for demographic and immunologic characteristics in the non-induction and IL2RA induction groups; the Thymoglobulin induction group had significantly higher risk patients. Significantly fewer episodes of acute rejection occurred at one yr in patients treated with thymoglobulin and IL2RA vs. no induction (18% vs. 47%, p = 0.003, 26% vs. 47%, p = 0.02). Three yr graft survival was significantly improved in the IL2RA group compared to the non-induction group (85% vs. 68%, p = 0.032). Despite the thymoglobulin group being at high risk, they had similar graft survival rates compared to both the IL2RA group (76% vs. 85%, p = 0.18) and the non-induction group (76% vs. 68%, p = 0.48). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that induction therapy (combining IL2RA and thymoglobulin) independently reduced the risk of both acute rejection and graft loss. Conclusion: The use and type of induction therapy in AA patients significantly reduces acute rejection rates and may improve long-term graft outcomes in AA patients.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 40-47 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Clinical Transplantation |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Jan 2010 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- Transplantation
Keywords
- Acute rejection
- African Americans
- Antilymphocyte antibodies
- Graft outcomes
- Induction therapy
- Interleukin-2
- Kidney transplantation
- Receptor antibodies