TY - JOUR
T1 - Effects of the Facial Osseous Defect Morphology on Gingival Dynamics After Immediate Tooth Replacement and Guided Bone Regeneration
T2 - 1-Year Results
AU - Kan, Joseph Y.K.
AU - Rungcharassaeng, Kitichai
AU - Sclar, Anthony
AU - Lozada, Jaime L.
N1 - PubMed.cn是医学,生命科学领域的数据库,旨在组织、分享科研领域信息。为用户提供文献检索,图片检索,影响因子查询,免费全文下载,国家自然科学基金统计分析等服务.
PY - 2007/7
Y1 - 2007/7
N2 - Purpose: This article describes different scenarios of facial osseous defects when the osseous-gingival relationship exceeds 3 mm and evaluates the effects of the morphology of the compromised facial bone on gingival dynamics after immediate tooth replacement and guided bone regeneration. The implant success rate and peri-implant bone change were also reported. Materials and Methods: Twenty-three patients treated consecutively with the mean age of 39.5 years (range, 25 to 63 years) underwent immediate tooth replacement and guided bone regeneration in sockets with facial bony defects exceeding 3 mm. Facial bony defects were categorized into V-, U-, and Ultra-U (UU)-shaped. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 1-year after implant placement. Results: At 1-year, the implant success rate was 100% (23/23). No marginal bone change of greater than 1 mm was observed. Greater than 1.5 mm of facial gingival recessions were noted in 8.3% (1/12) of V-shaped, 42.8% (3/7) of U-shaped, and 100% (4/4) of UU-shaped defects. Conclusions: U- and UU-shaped defects showed significantly higher frequency and magnitude of facial gingival recession (>1.5 mm) when compared with V-shaped defects 1-year after immediate tooth replacement and guided bone regeneration. It is important to identify the type of facial bony defect during diagnosis and treatment planning, so that appropriate treatment can be prescribed. The combination of delayed implant placement after staged reconstruction of unfavorable U- and UU-shaped labial extraction socket defects should be considered in areas of high esthetic concern. © 2007 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
AB - Purpose: This article describes different scenarios of facial osseous defects when the osseous-gingival relationship exceeds 3 mm and evaluates the effects of the morphology of the compromised facial bone on gingival dynamics after immediate tooth replacement and guided bone regeneration. The implant success rate and peri-implant bone change were also reported. Materials and Methods: Twenty-three patients treated consecutively with the mean age of 39.5 years (range, 25 to 63 years) underwent immediate tooth replacement and guided bone regeneration in sockets with facial bony defects exceeding 3 mm. Facial bony defects were categorized into V-, U-, and Ultra-U (UU)-shaped. The patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically at 1-year after implant placement. Results: At 1-year, the implant success rate was 100% (23/23). No marginal bone change of greater than 1 mm was observed. Greater than 1.5 mm of facial gingival recessions were noted in 8.3% (1/12) of V-shaped, 42.8% (3/7) of U-shaped, and 100% (4/4) of UU-shaped defects. Conclusions: U- and UU-shaped defects showed significantly higher frequency and magnitude of facial gingival recession (>1.5 mm) when compared with V-shaped defects 1-year after immediate tooth replacement and guided bone regeneration. It is important to identify the type of facial bony defect during diagnosis and treatment planning, so that appropriate treatment can be prescribed. The combination of delayed implant placement after staged reconstruction of unfavorable U- and UU-shaped labial extraction socket defects should be considered in areas of high esthetic concern. © 2007 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.
KW - Cuspid
KW - Dental Implantation, Endosseous/methods
KW - Follow-Up Studies
KW - Facial Bones/pathology
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Bone Transplantation
KW - Adult
KW - Treatment Outcome
KW - Bone Regeneration
KW - Gingiva/growth & development
KW - Incisor
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/34250718784
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/34250718784#tab=citedBy
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/dfe5b8f7-32d3-3663-9139-7d5c6c993dae/
U2 - 10.1016/j.joms.2007.04.006
DO - 10.1016/j.joms.2007.04.006
M3 - Article
C2 - 17586345
SN - 0278-2391
VL - 65
SP - 13
EP - 19
JO - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
JF - Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
IS - 7 Suppl 1
ER -