Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effect of type of dialysis membrane on bone in haemodialysis patients

  • Anibal Ferreira
  • , Abderhaman Ghazali
  • , José Galvão
  • , Jean Claude Souberbielle
  • , Peter M. Jehle
  • , Subburaman Mohan
  • , Béatrice Descamps-Latscha
  • , Roxana Oprisiu
  • , Albert Fournier
  • , Tilman B. Drüeke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Uraemic bone disease is the result of a number of factors modulating bone formation and resorption in a complex manner. In the present study, the hypothesis tested was that the type of haemodialysis membrane used for renal replacement therapy might also play a role.

METHODS: We conducted a prospective, open study in 24 chronic haemodialysis patients who were randomized to dialysis treatment with either cellulosic (CELL group, n=11) or polyacrylonitrile (AN-69 group, n=13) membrane for 9 months. Repeated determinations of plasma parameters reflecting bone turnover were done in all patients, and a bone biopsy in a subgroup at the start and end of study.

RESULTS: At the start, mean plasma intact parathyroid hormone levels were comparable between the two groups and they did not vary significantly at 9 months of treatment. Similarly, plasma bone-specific alkaline phosphatase and osteocalcin (markers of bone formation), and cross-laps (marker of bone resorption) remained unchanged. However, plasma insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) progressively decreased from 169 to 119 ng/ml in AN-69 group (P<0.01), whereas it remained unchanged in CELL group. In addition, the levels of IGF binding protein (IGFBP)-1 and IGFBP-2 were increased while the levels of IGFBP-5 were decreased in AN-69 group. In the five patients of each group who had repeat bone biopsies, histomorphometric analysis showed a decrease in osteoblast surface, osteoclast surface and osteoclast number in AN-69 group at 9 months, compared with baseline values measured at the start of the study. In contrast, all three parameters significantly increased in the CELL group at 9 months (P<0.001 for the difference between each of the three parameters). Bone formation rate decreased by 31% in the AN-69 group, but increased by 50% in CELL group. However, this latter difference was not statistically significant. Plasma interleukin (IL)-6 and soluble IL-6 receptor levels did not change in the two groups of patients who had undergone bone biopsy.

CONCLUSION: Dialysis with CELL membrane was associated with increased bone turnover whereas the use of AN-69 membrane was associated with decreased bone turnover, suggesting a beneficial effect of the latter on high-turnover uraemic bone disease. However, as the number of patients with repeat bone biopsies was small, these findings need to be confirmed in a larger study. Further studies are also needed to evaluate whether or not the changes in IGF system components play a role in decreased bone cell activity in patients on dialysis using the AN-69 polyacrylonitrile membrane.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1230-1238
Number of pages9
JournalNephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Volume16
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2001
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Nephrology
  • Transplantation

Keywords

  • Bone biopsy
  • Bone markers
  • Haemodialysis
  • Membrane
  • Osteodystrophy
  • Renal
  • Interleukin-6/blood
  • Humans
  • Cellulose
  • Acrylonitrile/analogs & derivatives
  • Hyperparathyroidism/etiology
  • Biomarkers/blood
  • Renal Dialysis/instrumentation
  • Acrylic Resins
  • France
  • Insulin-Like Growth Factor I/analysis
  • Calcium/blood
  • Parathyroid Hormone/blood
  • Receptors, Interleukin-6/blood
  • Bone and Bones/metabolism
  • Membranes, Artificial
  • White People
  • Alkaline Phosphatase/blood
  • Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Proteins/blood
  • Osteocalcin/blood
  • Spain
  • Phosphorus/blood
  • Animals
  • Biopsy
  • Kidney Failure, Chronic/blood
  • Biocompatible Materials

Cite this