TY - JOUR
T1 - Design process and protocol description for a multi-problem mental health intervention within a stepped care approach for adolescents in India
AU - Chorpita, Bruce F.
AU - Daleiden, Eric L.
AU - Malik, Kanika
AU - Gellatly, Resham
AU - Boustani, Maya M.
AU - Michelson, Daniel
AU - Knudsen, Kendra
AU - Mathur, Sonal
AU - Patel, Vikram H.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020
PY - 2020/10
Y1 - 2020/10
N2 - This paper documents the collaborative design of a mental health intervention for adolescents in India with anxiety, depression, or anger-related concerns. The process was characterized by three phases of formative activities: (1) an intensive review of the service context, (2) selection of an overall design strategy (e.g., whether to choose existing evidence-based treatments or build new treatments in context), and (3) a period of prototyping, testing, and refining. Each phase resulted in specific outputs, which were, respectively, (1) a detailed articulation of values and preferences (setting expectations for what the ideal protocol should be), (2) a set of build parameters representing a blueprint that managed strategic compromises for this context, and (3) a working protocol. We outline the steps of this design process, summarize data from an open-trial clinical case series, and illustrate the resulting working protocol, which will be tested in a future larger trial. We conclude with insights and observations likely to be relevant to protocol design activity in a variety of contexts, most particularly those in low-and-middle-income countries such as India.
AB - This paper documents the collaborative design of a mental health intervention for adolescents in India with anxiety, depression, or anger-related concerns. The process was characterized by three phases of formative activities: (1) an intensive review of the service context, (2) selection of an overall design strategy (e.g., whether to choose existing evidence-based treatments or build new treatments in context), and (3) a period of prototyping, testing, and refining. Each phase resulted in specific outputs, which were, respectively, (1) a detailed articulation of values and preferences (setting expectations for what the ideal protocol should be), (2) a set of build parameters representing a blueprint that managed strategic compromises for this context, and (3) a working protocol. We outline the steps of this design process, summarize data from an open-trial clinical case series, and illustrate the resulting working protocol, which will be tested in a future larger trial. We conclude with insights and observations likely to be relevant to protocol design activity in a variety of contexts, most particularly those in low-and-middle-income countries such as India.
KW - Common elements
KW - Design
KW - India
KW - Intervention
KW - Modularity
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85089802907
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85089802907#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103698
DO - 10.1016/j.brat.2020.103698
M3 - Article
C2 - 32858304
SN - 0005-7967
VL - 133
JO - Behaviour Research and Therapy
JF - Behaviour Research and Therapy
M1 - 103698
ER -