TY - JOUR
T1 - Derivative-free superiorization with component-wise perturbations
AU - Censor, Yair
AU - Heaton, Howard
AU - Schulte, Reinhard
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2019/4/4
Y1 - 2019/4/4
N2 - Superiorization reduces, not necessarily minimizes, the value of a target function while seeking constraints compatibility. This is done by taking a solely feasibility-seeking algorithm, analyzing its perturbation resilience, and proactively perturbing its iterates accordingly to steer them toward a feasible point with reduced value of the target function. When the perturbation steps are computationally efficient, this enables generation of a superior result with essentially the same computational cost as that of the original feasibility-seeking algorithm. In this work, we refine previous formulations of the superiorization method to create a more general framework, enabling target function reduction steps that do not require partial derivatives of the target function. In perturbations that use partial derivatives, the step-sizes in the perturbation phase of the superiorization method are chosen independently from the choice of the nonascent directions. This is no longer true when component-wise perturbations are employed. In that case, the step-sizes must be linked to the choice of the nonascent direction in every step. Besides presenting and validating these notions, we give a computational demonstration of superiorization with component-wise perturbations for a problem of computerized tomography image reconstruction.
AB - Superiorization reduces, not necessarily minimizes, the value of a target function while seeking constraints compatibility. This is done by taking a solely feasibility-seeking algorithm, analyzing its perturbation resilience, and proactively perturbing its iterates accordingly to steer them toward a feasible point with reduced value of the target function. When the perturbation steps are computationally efficient, this enables generation of a superior result with essentially the same computational cost as that of the original feasibility-seeking algorithm. In this work, we refine previous formulations of the superiorization method to create a more general framework, enabling target function reduction steps that do not require partial derivatives of the target function. In perturbations that use partial derivatives, the step-sizes in the perturbation phase of the superiorization method are chosen independently from the choice of the nonascent directions. This is no longer true when component-wise perturbations are employed. In that case, the step-sizes must be linked to the choice of the nonascent direction in every step. Besides presenting and validating these notions, we give a computational demonstration of superiorization with component-wise perturbations for a problem of computerized tomography image reconstruction.
KW - Component-wise perturbations
KW - Derivative-free
KW - Feasibility-seeking
KW - Image reconstruction
KW - Perturbation resilience
KW - Superiorization
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85059512278&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85059512278&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11075-018-0524-0
DO - 10.1007/s11075-018-0524-0
M3 - Article
SN - 1017-1398
VL - 80
SP - 1219
EP - 1240
JO - Numerical Algorithms
JF - Numerical Algorithms
IS - 4
ER -