TY - JOUR
T1 - Computed Tomography Cisternography for Evaluation of Trigeminal Neuralgia When Magnetic Resonance Imaging Is Contraindicated
T2 - Case Report and Review of the Literature
AU - Gospodarev, Vadim
AU - Chakravarthy, Vikram
AU - Harms, Casey
AU - Myers, Hannah
AU - Kaplan, Brett
AU - Kim, Esther
AU - Pond, Matthew
AU - De Los Reyes, Kenneth
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2018/5
Y1 - 2018/5
N2 - Background: Trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) causes severe unilateral facial pain. The etiology is hypothesized to be segmental demyelination of the trigeminal nerve root via compression by the superior cerebellar artery (SCA). Microvascular decompression (MVD) allows immediate and long-term pain relief. Preoperative evaluation includes magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or magnetic resonance angiography of the brain. Having a pacemaker is a contraindication for MRI. There have been isolated reports of using computed tomography (CT) cisternography scans for radiation planning for TGN. Case Description: A 75-year-old male with a permanent pacemaker who had refractory TGN in the V2 (maxillary) distribution of the trigeminal nerve underwent CT cisternography to prepare for MVD. CT angiography with Isovue 370 intravenous contrast injection and 0.625-mm axial images were obtained from the skull base across the posterior fossa. An intrathecal injection of Isovue 180 was performed at the L2/3 level. Imaging revealed the right SCA abutting the medial margin of the proximal right trigeminal nerve. In surgery (K.D.), a standard retrosigmoid suboccipital craniotomy was performed to access the cerebellopontine angle and separate the abutting SCA and trigeminal nerve. The patient had immediate pain relief. Conclusions: MRI is the preferred method of evaluating for TGN because it offers excellent visualization of vasculature in relation to the trigeminal nerve without accompanying radiation exposure. However, for patients who have contraindications to MRI, CT cisternography is shown to also be an effective method for visualizing the trigeminal root entry zone and nearby vasculature in preparation for MVD of the trigeminal nerve.
AB - Background: Trigeminal neuralgia (TGN) causes severe unilateral facial pain. The etiology is hypothesized to be segmental demyelination of the trigeminal nerve root via compression by the superior cerebellar artery (SCA). Microvascular decompression (MVD) allows immediate and long-term pain relief. Preoperative evaluation includes magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and/or magnetic resonance angiography of the brain. Having a pacemaker is a contraindication for MRI. There have been isolated reports of using computed tomography (CT) cisternography scans for radiation planning for TGN. Case Description: A 75-year-old male with a permanent pacemaker who had refractory TGN in the V2 (maxillary) distribution of the trigeminal nerve underwent CT cisternography to prepare for MVD. CT angiography with Isovue 370 intravenous contrast injection and 0.625-mm axial images were obtained from the skull base across the posterior fossa. An intrathecal injection of Isovue 180 was performed at the L2/3 level. Imaging revealed the right SCA abutting the medial margin of the proximal right trigeminal nerve. In surgery (K.D.), a standard retrosigmoid suboccipital craniotomy was performed to access the cerebellopontine angle and separate the abutting SCA and trigeminal nerve. The patient had immediate pain relief. Conclusions: MRI is the preferred method of evaluating for TGN because it offers excellent visualization of vasculature in relation to the trigeminal nerve without accompanying radiation exposure. However, for patients who have contraindications to MRI, CT cisternography is shown to also be an effective method for visualizing the trigeminal root entry zone and nearby vasculature in preparation for MVD of the trigeminal nerve.
KW - CT cisternography
KW - Microvascular decompression
KW - Superior cerebellar artery
KW - Trigeminal neuralgia
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85044735113
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85044735113#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.066
DO - 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.02.066
M3 - Article
C2 - 29477005
SN - 1878-8750
VL - 113
SP - 180
EP - 183
JO - World Neurosurgery
JF - World Neurosurgery
ER -