Complications of diverting ileostomy after low anterior resection for rectal carcinoma

Sean Maroney, Carlos Chavez De Paz, Marjunphilip Duldulao, Tracey Kim, Mark E. Reeves, Kevork K. Kazanjian, Naveenraj Solomon, Carlos Garberoglio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

There have been few studies directly comparing the postoperative complications in patients with a diverting ileostomy to patients who were not diverted after low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal carcinoma. This study is a retrospective chart review of all rectal carcinoma patients (99) who underwent a LAR from January 2009 to December 2014 at Loma Linda University Medical Center and Veterans Affairs Loma Linda Healthcare System. A majority of patients were diverted (58% vs 42%). The diverted patients were more likely to have a low tumor location (P<0.01), preoperative chemoradiation (P<0.01), and more intraoperative blood loss (P<0.01). Our study shows a statistically significant higher overall complication rate among patients receiving a diverting ileostomy in the six months after LAR (61% vs 38%, P 5 0.02). The difference is due to a higher rate of readmission (27% vs 14%) and acute kidney injury (14% vs 5%) in patients with a diverting ileostomy. It also shows that there is a higher rate of unplanned reoperation (11% vs 6%) due to anastomotic leak (17% vs 5%) in nondiverted patients. Further studies are needed to refine the specific indications to maximize the benefit of diverting ileostomy after LAR for rectal carcinoma.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1033-1037
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Surgeon
Volume82
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 2016

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Surgery

Cite this