Comparison of efficacy of induction therapy in low immunologic risk African-American kidney transplant recipients

James N. Fleming, David J. Taber, Nicole A. Weimert, Maria F. Egidi, John McGillicuddy, Charles F. Bratton, Angello Lin, Kenneth D. Chavin, Prabhakar K. Baliga

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

African-Americans (AA) have higher acute rejection rates and poorer long-term graft survival rates when compared with non-AA. It is yet to be demonstrated that the type of induction therapy modifies outcomes in this 'high-risk' population. This retrospective analysis compares the efficacy of induction therapy [antilymphocyte antibodies (ALA) versus interleukin-2 receptor antagonists (IL-2RA)] in the AA population. Some 189 AAs were included. There was no difference in acute rejection at one year between the groups (ALA (12%) or IL-2RA (12%), P = 0.89). Type of induction therapy had no significant effect on death-censored (P = 0.61) or uncensored graft survival (P = 0.32). There was no difference between CMV or BK virus infections between the groups (P = 0.14 and 0.94 respectively). Type of induction therapy does not appear to affect acute rejection rates or long-term graft survival in low-risk AA kidney transplant recipients

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)500-505
Number of pages6
JournalTransplant International
Volume23
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Transplantation

Keywords

  • African-American
  • Ethnicity
  • Graft survival
  • Induction
  • Kidney
  • Transplant

Cite this