Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Comparison of accuracy captured by different controlled languages in oral pathology diagnoses.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

This project was comparing the accuracy of capturing the oral pathology diagnoses among different coding systems. 55 diagnoses were selected for comparison among 5 coding systems. The results of accuracy in capturing oral diagnoses are: AFIP (96.4%), followed by Read 99 (85.5%), SNOMED 98 (74.5%), ICD-9 (43.6%), and CDT-3 (14.5%). It shows that the currently used coding systems, ICD-9 and CDT-3, were inadequate, whereas the AFIP coding system captured the majority of oral diagnoses. In conclusion, the most commonly used medical and dental coding systems lack terms for the diagnosis of oral and dental conditions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)918
Number of pages1
JournalAMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium
Volume2005
StatePublished - 2005
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Medicine

Keywords

  • Vocabulary, Controlled
  • Humans
  • Pathology, Oral/classification
  • Diagnosis, Oral

Cite this