Code R: Redesigning Hospital-wide Peer Review for Academic Hospitals

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

In most health care institutions, physician peer review is the primary method for maintaining and measuring physician competency and quality of care issues. However, many teaching hospitals do not have a method of tracking resident trainees’ involvement in adverse cases. At the study institution, Code R was introduced as a measure to capture resident trainee involvement in the hospital-wide peer review process. The authors conducted a retrospective review of all peer review cases from January 2008 to December 2011 in an academic medical center and determined the quantity and type of resident errors that occurred compared to attending faculty. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education’s core competencies served as a framework to categorize quality of care errors. The addition of Code R to the peer review process can be readily adopted by other institutions to help improve resident education, facilitate faculty supervision, and potentially improve patient safety.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)429-433
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Medical Quality
Volume31
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Medicine

Keywords

  • graduate medical education
  • peer review
  • quality improvement
  • residency training
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods
  • Humans
  • Clinical Competence/standards
  • Peer Review/methods
  • Internship and Residency/organization & administration
  • Hospitals, Teaching/organization & administration
  • Quality Improvement
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Medical Errors/prevention & control

Cite this