Abstract
1. The presence of a prosthetic tricuspid valve is a relative but not absolute contraindication to endocardial pacing. 2. Epicardial pacing is a good option but does involve more surgery. 3. Innovative endocardial approaches, such as the leadless pacemaker, can be considered depending on the indication to pace. 4. Hybrid procedures (part endocardial and part epicardial) and newer leads (lumenless leads) can be used in some patients.
| Original language | American English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Arrhythmias in Adult Congenital Heart Disease |
| Subtitle of host publication | A Case-Based Approach |
| Publisher | Elsevier |
| Chapter | 1 |
| Pages | 39-46 |
| Number of pages | 8 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9780323485685 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780323496094 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2019 |
ASJC Scopus Subject Areas
- General Medicine
Keywords
- Atrioventricular block
- Coronary sinus
- Ebstein’s anomaly
- Hybrid procedure
- Pacemaker
- Tricuspid valve
Disciplines
- Cardiology
- Internal Medicine
- Medicine and Health Sciences
Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS