Bacterial leakage of mineral trioxide aggregate as a root-end filling material

Mahmound Torabinejad, Akbar Falah Rastegar, James D. Kettering, Thomas R. Pitt Ford

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Previous dye leakage studies have shown that mineral trioxide aggregate leaks significantly less than other commonly used root-end filling materials. This study determined the time needed for Staphylococcus epidermidis to penetrate a 3-mm thickness of amalgam, Super-EBA, Intermediate Restorative Material (IRM), or mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) as root-end filling materials. Fifty-six single-rooted extracted human teeth were cleaned and shaped using a step-back technique. Following root-end resection, 48 root-end cavities were filled with amalgam, Super-EBA, IRM, or MTA. Four root-end cavities were filled with thermoplasticized gutta-percha without a root canal sealer (+ control), and another four were filled with sticky wax covered with two layers of nail polish (- control). After attaching the teeth to plastic caps of 12-ml plastic vials and placing the root ends into phenol red broth, the set-ups were sterilized overnight with ethylene dioxide gas. A tenth of a microliter of broth containing S. epidermidis was placed into the root canal of 46 teeth (40 experimental, 3 positive, and 3 negative control groups). In addition, the root canals of two teeth with test root-end filling materials and one tooth from the positive and negative control groups were filled with sterile saline. The number of days required for the test bacteria to penetrate various root-end filling materials was determined. Most samples whose apical 3 mm were filled with amalgam, Super-EBA, or IRM began leaking at 6 to 57 days. In contrast, the majority of samples whose root ends were filled with MTA did not show any leakage throughout the experimental period (90 days) in this study. Statistical analysis of the data showed no significant difference between the leakage of amalgam, Super-EBA, and IRM. However, MTA leaked significantly less than other root-end filling materials maintained under test conditions for 90 days in this experiment (p < 0.05).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)109-112
Number of pages4
JournalJournal of Endodontics
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1995

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • General Dentistry

Cite this