Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Acoustic distortion products in rabbit ear canal. II. Sites of origin revealed by suppression contours and pure-tone exposures

  • G. K. Martin
  • , B. L. Lonsbury-Martin
  • , R. Probst
  • , S. A. Scheinin
  • , A. C. Coats

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Previous work on acoustic distortion products (DPs) recorded from the ear canal has not established unequivocally whether emitted DPs principally reflect basilar-membrane nonlinearities at the frequency sites of the primary tones, f{hook}1 and f{hook}2, or if the DP-frequency place itself makes a significant contribution to the emitted response. Results from some studies on acoustic emissions attribute generation of the emitted DP almost exclusively to the regions of maximum primary-tone interaction, while the findings of other investigations implicate reemission of the response from the DP locus as a significant contributor to response magnitude. Using suppression, interfering tones, and temporary threshold shift (TTS) procedures, the work reported here was designed to establish more definitively the precise contributions of the basilar-membrane regions involved in generating acoustic DPs in rabbits. Suppression tuning curves and interfering-tone experiments indicated that for the DP at 2f{hook}1 - f{hook}2, regions near the f{hook}1 or f{hook}2 frequencies were the major contributors to the emitted response. However, for the higher-frequency DP at 2f{hook}2 - f{hook}1, the basilar-membrane region just basal to the DP site was implicated as the generator. Following brief episodes of TTS at frequencies related to either the DP or the primary tones, the locus of the exposure stimulus that most effectively reduced the magnitude of the 2f{hook}1 - f{hook}2 response also implicated the region of maximal primary-tone interaction in the generation of the acoustic DP. In contrast, for the DP at 2f{hook}2 - f{hook}1, basilar-membrane sites nearer the DP were identified as the primary contributors to the emitted response. Both sets of results imply that different DPs recorded from the ear canal may originate from unique regions of primary-tone interaction along the basilar membrane.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)191-208
Number of pages18
JournalHearing Research
Volume28
Issue number2-3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1987

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Sensory Systems

Keywords

  • Acoustic distortion product
  • Rabbit
  • Sound exposure
  • Suppression

Cite this