TY - JOUR
T1 - Acoustic distortion products in humans
T2 - Systematic changes in amplitude as a function of 2//i ratio
AU - Harris, F. P.
AU - Lonsbury-Martin, B. L.
AU - Stagner, B. B.
AU - Coats, A. C.
AU - Martin, G. K.
N1 - J Acoust Soc Am. 1989 Jan;85(1):220-9. Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.
PY - 1989/1
Y1 - 1989/1
N2 - The effects of primary-tone separation on the amplitude of distortion-product emissions (DPEs) at the 2/, f2 frequency were systematically examined in ten ears of five subjects. All individuals had normal hearing and middle-ear function based upon standard clinical measures. Acoustic-distortion products were elicited at 1, 2.5, and 4 kHz by equilevel primaries at 65, 75, and 85 dB SPL, while f2/f1, ratios were varied in 0.02 increments from 1.01-1.41 (4 kHz), 1.01-1.59 (2.5 kHz), or 1.01-1.79 (1 kHz). A principal outcome reflected in the detailed structure of both average and individual ratio functions was a nonmonotonic change in DPE amplitude as the ratio of f2/fi increased. Despite the presence of amplitude nonmonotonicities, there was clearly a region of/, andy^ separation that generated a maximum DPE. The effects of primary-tone separation on DPE amplitudes were systematically related to DPE frequency and primary-tone level. For all three levels of stimulation, thef2/f1, ratio was inversely related to DPE frequency. Thus larger ratios reflecting a greater separation of/, and/2 were more effective in generating DPEs at 1 kHz rather than at 4 kHz. The optimal ratio for 2.5 kHz fell at an intermediate value. Conversely, acoustic distortion-product amplitude as a function of primary-tone level was directly related to the frequency separation of the primary tones. Regardless of the frequency region of the primary tones, smaller f2/f1, ratios were superior in generating DPEs in response to 65-dB stimuli, whereas larger ratios elicited bigger DPEs with primaries at 75 and 85 dB SPL. Within any specific stimulus-parameter combination, individual variability in DPE amplitude was noted. When all stimulus conditions describing the variations in frequency and level were considered, an f2/f1, ratio of 1.22 was most effective in maximizing DPE amplitude.
AB - The effects of primary-tone separation on the amplitude of distortion-product emissions (DPEs) at the 2/, f2 frequency were systematically examined in ten ears of five subjects. All individuals had normal hearing and middle-ear function based upon standard clinical measures. Acoustic-distortion products were elicited at 1, 2.5, and 4 kHz by equilevel primaries at 65, 75, and 85 dB SPL, while f2/f1, ratios were varied in 0.02 increments from 1.01-1.41 (4 kHz), 1.01-1.59 (2.5 kHz), or 1.01-1.79 (1 kHz). A principal outcome reflected in the detailed structure of both average and individual ratio functions was a nonmonotonic change in DPE amplitude as the ratio of f2/fi increased. Despite the presence of amplitude nonmonotonicities, there was clearly a region of/, andy^ separation that generated a maximum DPE. The effects of primary-tone separation on DPE amplitudes were systematically related to DPE frequency and primary-tone level. For all three levels of stimulation, thef2/f1, ratio was inversely related to DPE frequency. Thus larger ratios reflecting a greater separation of/, and/2 were more effective in generating DPEs at 1 kHz rather than at 4 kHz. The optimal ratio for 2.5 kHz fell at an intermediate value. Conversely, acoustic distortion-product amplitude as a function of primary-tone level was directly related to the frequency separation of the primary tones. Regardless of the frequency region of the primary tones, smaller f2/f1, ratios were superior in generating DPEs in response to 65-dB stimuli, whereas larger ratios elicited bigger DPEs with primaries at 75 and 85 dB SPL. Within any specific stimulus-parameter combination, individual variability in DPE amplitude was noted. When all stimulus conditions describing the variations in frequency and level were considered, an f2/f1, ratio of 1.22 was most effective in maximizing DPE amplitude.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0024587434
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/0024587434#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1121/1.397728
DO - 10.1121/1.397728
M3 - Article
C2 - 2921404
SN - 0001-4966
VL - 85
SP - 220
EP - 229
JO - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
JF - Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
IS - 1
ER -