TY - JOUR
T1 - A Multivariate Method for Measurement Error Correction Using Pairs of Concentration Biomarkers
AU - Fraser, Gary E.
AU - Yan, Ru
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by NIH grant 5R01 CA094594.
PY - 2007/1
Y1 - 2007/1
N2 - Purpose: Measurement error is a pervasive problem in behavioral epidemiology, and available methods of correction all have generally untenable assumptions. We propose a multivariate method with more realistic assumptions. Methods: The method uses two concentration biomarkers for each nutritional variable of interest and structural equation modeling. This produces corrected estimates of the effects on an outcome variable of changing the true exposure variables by one standard deviation, a standardized regression calibration. However, hypothesis testing in original units is preserved. The main assumptions are that certain error correlations between dietary estimates and biomarkers or between biomarkers be close to zero. Results: Two illustrative models used simulated data with the covariance structure of a real data set. The corrections produced often were very substantial. A sensitivity analysis allowed error correlations to depart from zero over a modest range. Root mean square biases show the advantage of the corrected approach. Relatively large calibration studies are needed for adequate precision. Conclusions: As long as concentration biomarkers are selected carefully, error-corrected multivariate hypothesis testing and standardized effect estimation is possible. With the deviations from assumptions that were tested, the corrected method usually produces much less biased results than an uncorrected analysis. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
AB - Purpose: Measurement error is a pervasive problem in behavioral epidemiology, and available methods of correction all have generally untenable assumptions. We propose a multivariate method with more realistic assumptions. Methods: The method uses two concentration biomarkers for each nutritional variable of interest and structural equation modeling. This produces corrected estimates of the effects on an outcome variable of changing the true exposure variables by one standard deviation, a standardized regression calibration. However, hypothesis testing in original units is preserved. The main assumptions are that certain error correlations between dietary estimates and biomarkers or between biomarkers be close to zero. Results: Two illustrative models used simulated data with the covariance structure of a real data set. The corrections produced often were very substantial. A sensitivity analysis allowed error correlations to depart from zero over a modest range. Root mean square biases show the advantage of the corrected approach. Relatively large calibration studies are needed for adequate precision. Conclusions: As long as concentration biomarkers are selected carefully, error-corrected multivariate hypothesis testing and standardized effect estimation is possible. With the deviations from assumptions that were tested, the corrected method usually produces much less biased results than an uncorrected analysis. © 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
KW - Biomarkers
KW - Latent Variables
KW - Measurement Error Correction
KW - Nutritional Epidemiology
KW - Regression Calibration
KW - Standardized Regression
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33845451680
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/33845451680#tab=citedBy
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/30c30800-e70c-305e-a531-96bead75b778/
U2 - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.08.002
DO - 10.1016/j.annepidem.2006.08.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 17140813
SN - 1047-2797
VL - 17
SP - 64
EP - 73
JO - Annals of Epidemiology
JF - Annals of Epidemiology
IS - 1
ER -