A comparison of synovial fluid pressure after immediate versus gradual mandibular advancement in the miniature pig

Alan S. Herford, Robert Hoffman, Samuel Demirdji, Philip J. Boyne, Joseph M. Caruso, V. Leroy Leggitt, Luis Vega

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: Mandibular advancement is a commonly performed surgical procedure for the treatment of mandibular hypoplasia. With the increased use of rigid fixation, there has been a decrease in the amount of relapse but an increase in the amount of force transmitted to the condyles. Gradual advancement of the mandible by distraction osteogenesis slowly overcomes the soft-tissue envelope and may decrease the amount of force exerted on the condyles. The purpose of this study was to develop an animal model to measure the magnitude of pressure associated with immediate versus gradual mandibular advancement. Materials and Methods: A 2.0-mm pressure transducer was placed in the superior joint space in 2 miniature pigs. In the first animal, immediate advancement of the mandible with rigid fixation was performed. The synovial fluid hydrostatic pressures were measured prior to surgery and postoperatively. A second animal underwent gradual advancement with distraction osteogenesis. The synovial fluid hydrostatic pressures were measured prior to and after each activation of the distraction device. The condyles were examined radiographically and microscopically. Results: The superior joint space fluid pressures increased and remained elevated over a 5-week period after immediate advancement. In the gradually advanced mandible, the pressures were elevated but returned to near baseline prior to the activation the following day. Conclusion: This animal model is useful to directly measure the pressure that is exerted on the condyle. This will allow further studies to compare methods for mandibular advancement. It is likely that gradual advancement of the mandible by distraction osteogenesis produces less force and causes less condylar resorption than large mandibular advancement stabilized with rigid fixation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)775-785
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Volume63
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2005

ASJC Scopus Subject Areas

  • Surgery
  • Oral Surgery
  • Otorhinolaryngology

Cite this