TY - JOUR
T1 - 3D digital impression systems compared with traditional techniques in dentistry
T2 - A recent data systematic review
AU - Cicciù, Marco
AU - Fiorillo, Luca
AU - D'Amico, Cesare
AU - Gambino, Dario
AU - Amantia, Emanuele Mario
AU - Laino, Luigi
AU - Crimi, Salvatore
AU - Campagna, Paola
AU - Bianchi, Alberto
AU - Herford, Alan Scott
AU - Cervino, Gabriele
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 by the authors.
PY - 2020/4/1
Y1 - 2020/4/1
N2 - The advent of new technologies in the field of medicine and dentistry is giving improvements that lead the clinicians to have materials and procedures able to improve patients' quality of life. In dentistry, the last digital techniques offer a fully digital computerized workflow that does not include the standard multiple traditional phases. The purpose of this study is to evaluate all clinical trials and clinical randomized trials related to the digital or dental impression technique in prosthetic dentistry trying to give the readers global information about advantages and disadvantages of each procedure. Data collection was conducted in the main scientific search engines, including articles from the last 10 years, in order to obtain results that do not concern obsolete impression techniques. Elsevier, Pubmed and Embase have been screened as sources for performing the research. The results data demonstrated how the working time appears to be improved with digital workflow, but without a significant result (P = 0.72596). The papers have been selected following the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome (PICO) question, which is related to the progress on dental impression materials and technique. The comparison between dentists or practitioners with respect to classic impression procedures, and students open to new device and digital techniques seem to be the key factor on the final impression technique choice. Surely, digital techniques will end up supplanting the analogical ones altogether, improving the quality of oral rehabilitations, the economics of dental practice and also the perception by our patients.
AB - The advent of new technologies in the field of medicine and dentistry is giving improvements that lead the clinicians to have materials and procedures able to improve patients' quality of life. In dentistry, the last digital techniques offer a fully digital computerized workflow that does not include the standard multiple traditional phases. The purpose of this study is to evaluate all clinical trials and clinical randomized trials related to the digital or dental impression technique in prosthetic dentistry trying to give the readers global information about advantages and disadvantages of each procedure. Data collection was conducted in the main scientific search engines, including articles from the last 10 years, in order to obtain results that do not concern obsolete impression techniques. Elsevier, Pubmed and Embase have been screened as sources for performing the research. The results data demonstrated how the working time appears to be improved with digital workflow, but without a significant result (P = 0.72596). The papers have been selected following the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome (PICO) question, which is related to the progress on dental impression materials and technique. The comparison between dentists or practitioners with respect to classic impression procedures, and students open to new device and digital techniques seem to be the key factor on the final impression technique choice. Surely, digital techniques will end up supplanting the analogical ones altogether, improving the quality of oral rehabilitations, the economics of dental practice and also the perception by our patients.
KW - Dental
KW - Dental impression materials
KW - Dental impression technique
KW - Diagnosis
KW - Digital workflow
KW - Oral
KW - Prosthodontics
KW - Technology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85084751155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85084751155&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/MA13081982
DO - 10.3390/MA13081982
M3 - Review article
SN - 1996-1944
VL - 13
JO - Materials
JF - Materials
IS - 8
M1 - 1948
ER -