TY - JOUR
T1 - 056 Perampanel and secondarily generalised seizures in a pooled analysis of phase III studies and their open-label extension: effect of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs
AU - Ko, David Y.
AU - Williams, Betsy
AU - Patten, Anna
AU - Laurenza, Antonio
N1 - Introduction Perampanel is approved for adjunctive treatment of partial seizures, with or without secondarily generalised seizures (SGS), and primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures in epilepsy patients aged ≥12 years. Approval of perampanel for partial seizures was based on three randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III Studies 304 ([NCT00699972][1]), 305 ([NCT00699582][2]) and 306 ([NCT00700310][3]); patients completing these could enter open-label extension (OLEx) Study 307 ([NCT00735397][4]).
PY - 2018/6/1
Y1 - 2018/6/1
N2 - Purpose: Perampanel is approved for adjunctive treatment of partial seizures, with or without secondarily generalised seizures (SGS), and primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures in epilepsy patients aged ≥12 years. Approval of perampanel for partial seizures was based on three randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III Studies 304 (NCT00699972), 305 (NCT00699582) and 306 (NCT00700310); patients completing these could enter open-label extension (OLEx) Study 307 (NCT00735397). Here, we report efficacy of perampanel as adjunctive treatment of SGS by co-administration of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) versus non-EIAEDs in both the Phase III and OLEx studies. Method: In the double-blind studies, patients (≥12 years) with partial seizures, with or without SGS, receiving 1-3 AEDs at Baseline were randomised to placebo or 2-12 mg/ day perampanel for 19 weeks. In the OLEx, patients received ⩽12 mg/day perampanel for ⩽272 weeks. Efficacy assessments included median percent change in SGS frequency/ 28 days, SGS 50% and 75% responder and seizurefreedom rates. Results: For patients with SGS at pre-perampanel Baseline, 564 were in the double-blind studies, and 388 received perampanel for ≥1 year in the OLEx. In the double- blind studies, perampanel co-administered with an EIAED (carbamazepine, eslicarbazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin) had reduced efficacy compared with non- EIAEDs due to increased clearance; this was particularly evident at higher doses, although these differences were still greater than placebo. In the OLEx, concomitant administration of both non-EIAEDs and EIAEDs was associated with sustained efficacy, with slightly better efficacy during the first, second and third years of perampanel exposure for non-EIAEDs compared with EIAEDs. Conclusion: Perampanel demonstrated good and sustained long-term efficacy against SGS. With the recent FDA approval of perampanel for monotherapy use for partial seizures, non-EIAED data may be more relevant for consideration if perampanel is used as a single agent (no other AED) while real-world data and experience are accumulated.
AB - Purpose: Perampanel is approved for adjunctive treatment of partial seizures, with or without secondarily generalised seizures (SGS), and primary generalised tonic-clonic seizures in epilepsy patients aged ≥12 years. Approval of perampanel for partial seizures was based on three randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III Studies 304 (NCT00699972), 305 (NCT00699582) and 306 (NCT00700310); patients completing these could enter open-label extension (OLEx) Study 307 (NCT00735397). Here, we report efficacy of perampanel as adjunctive treatment of SGS by co-administration of enzyme-inducing antiepileptic drugs (EIAEDs) versus non-EIAEDs in both the Phase III and OLEx studies. Method: In the double-blind studies, patients (≥12 years) with partial seizures, with or without SGS, receiving 1-3 AEDs at Baseline were randomised to placebo or 2-12 mg/ day perampanel for 19 weeks. In the OLEx, patients received ⩽12 mg/day perampanel for ⩽272 weeks. Efficacy assessments included median percent change in SGS frequency/ 28 days, SGS 50% and 75% responder and seizurefreedom rates. Results: For patients with SGS at pre-perampanel Baseline, 564 were in the double-blind studies, and 388 received perampanel for ≥1 year in the OLEx. In the double- blind studies, perampanel co-administered with an EIAED (carbamazepine, eslicarbazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin) had reduced efficacy compared with non- EIAEDs due to increased clearance; this was particularly evident at higher doses, although these differences were still greater than placebo. In the OLEx, concomitant administration of both non-EIAEDs and EIAEDs was associated with sustained efficacy, with slightly better efficacy during the first, second and third years of perampanel exposure for non-EIAEDs compared with EIAEDs. Conclusion: Perampanel demonstrated good and sustained long-term efficacy against SGS. With the recent FDA approval of perampanel for monotherapy use for partial seizures, non-EIAED data may be more relevant for consideration if perampanel is used as a single agent (no other AED) while real-world data and experience are accumulated.
UR - https://jnnp.bmj.com/content/89/6/A23.2
UR - https://www.mendeley.com/catalogue/03cbf02d-298c-333f-9047-6998e06b33eb/
U2 - 10.1136/JNNP-2018-ANZAN.55
DO - 10.1136/JNNP-2018-ANZAN.55
M3 - Meeting abstract
VL - 89
SP - A23.2-A23
JO - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
JF - Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
IS - 6
ER -